 |
Where Every Issue is a Green Issue| Providing Wisdom in Building a Sustainable Future | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
New Evidence in the War on Toxins By Jon Dougal l Bio-accumulated Toxins (BAT's) are just one of the results of pesticide use. The issue of endocrine disruptors is the bigger issue resulting for overuse and resident abundance of herbicides, pesticides, rodenticides, as well as phthalates coming from plasticizers. Dole, Dow, Del Monte, Chiquita Brands, inc., Shell Oil and possibly many other agriculture based firms who have operated fruit growing operations abroad (read - Latin and So. America) are now being brought to task by American Law firms. Many workers have suffered severe health degradation due to the use of pesticides. While the U.S. has their Federal OSHA regulations to supposedly protect workers using chemicals of all kinds, most Latin American operations have not seen fit to try to protect workers. So while we enjoyed fruits delivered from Chile and Nicaragua the harvesting, packaging and maintenance workers have been going sterile, as well as evidencing other maladies like kidney and liver failure. Most of the DBCB -(dibromochloropropane) pesticide was applied in the 70's. Nearly 30 years later the effects are showing up in populations worldwide, numbering in the 100's of thousands. Meanwhile, the manufacturer of the chemical declines any responsibility stating that there is no evidence that this pesticide is the causative agent. This denial while records show that ca. three dozen workers at the Occidental Petroleum plant in California, in 1977, reported problems with sterility. Subsequent tests showed the workers had below normal sperm counts, and the EPA yanked the product of U.S. shelves. Does this scenario sound familiar, vis-à-vis vinyl chloride? Major chemical manufacturers denying responsibility while the evidence points to another conclusion. A recent lawsuit filed in Los Angeles indicates that in 1978, a memo from a top Dole official warned that the chemical was so dangerous that “implementing all the procedures in a guide to safe use of DBCP was nigh well impossible.” In California's central coast their has been an on-going battle between strawberry growers and the use of Methyl Bromide. Of course the same scenario has held that there was not enough evidence to stop its use. So does the “Precautionary Rule” apply here, or do we wait 30 years to find that in-fact pesticides do impact human health when adequate equipment is not required Haz-Mat attire by workers. Pesticides 'up Parkinson's risk' Some pesticides may be bad for human health Exposure to pesticides could lead to an increased risk of contracting Parkinson's disease, a study has found. Researchers discovered that high levels of exposure increased the risk by 39%, while even low levels raised it by 9%. However, the Aberdeen University researchers stressed that the overall risk of developing the disease remained small. In the UK, one person in 500 develops the incurable degenerative brain disease, or a similar illness. This doesn't prove that pesticides cause Parkinson's Disease - but does add to the weight of evidence of an association, says Dr Finlay Dick, Aberdeen University. Symptoms often include unsteadiness and tremor in the hands or arms, often alongside difficulties with speech or movement. Other studies have pointed strongly towards exposure to pesticides being involved in some cases, with agricultural workers showing higher rates of the illness. Knocked out The Aberdeen study, reported in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine, involved 959 cases of parkinsonism, a term used to describe people with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, and other, similar conditions. They all answered questioned about their lifetime occupational and recreational exposure to a variety of chemicals, including solvents, pesticides, iron, copper and manganese. Some have suggested that the head injuries involved in boxing could be linked to Parkinson's, so the patients were also asked whether they had ever been knocked unconscious. The study included more general questions about family health history and tobacco use. All the replies were then compared to those from a group of people of similar age and sex who had not been diagnosed with Parkinson's. They revealed that while having a family history of Parkinson's was the clearest risk factor for developing the disease, exposure to pesticides also gave a clear increase. People who had been knocked out once were 35% more at risk, while being knocked out on more than one occasion appeared to increase the risk by two-and-a-half times. However, the researchers acknowledged that it was impossible to tell from the results whether the patients had been knocked out after falling as a result of their Parkinson's. Dr Finlay Dick, the lead researcher, said: "What we have shown in the study is that with increasing risk to exposure to pesticides, the risk of Parkinson's Disease increases. "This doesn't prove that pesticides cause Parkinson's Disease - but does add to the weight of evidence of an association." 'Unsurprising A spokesman for the Parkinson's Disease Society echoed this: "The important finding from this study is confirmation that Parkinson's is not caused by any one factor, but instead a combination of genetic susceptibility and environmental factors." Georgina Downs, from the UK Pesticides Campaign, which represents people in rural communities, said: "Considering many pesticides are neurotoxic, then it isn't surprising that study after study has found associations with various chronic neurological and neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's. "This is highly significant in relation to the long-term exposure of rural residents and communities living near sprayed fields." |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Copyright © 2000-2007 GreenSage. All rights reserved.