Connecting the dots tells the story about
'you are what you eat'
Banning Routine Uses of Antibiotics in Farm Animals
By Gardiner Harris, NY Times
Editor's note: GreenSage and our founder has been promoting the elimination of antibiotics and hormones in our food for twenty years. We're thrilled at this proposal. Until a bill like this is passed, we encourage everyone to take care of your health and vote with your dollars by only purchasing your animal products that are labeled 'hormone and antibiotic free' or 'orgainc.'
The Obama administration announced in mid-July that it would seek to ban many routine uses of antibiotics in farm animals in hopes of reducing the spread of dangerous bacteria in humans.
In written testimony to the House Rules Committee, Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, principal deputy commissioner of food and drugs, said feeding antibiotics to healthy chickens, pigs and cattle done to encourage rapid growth should cease. And Dr. Sharfstein said that farmers should no longer be able to use antibiotics in animals without the supervision of a veterinarian.
Both practices lead to the development of bacteria that are immune to many treatments, he said.
The hearing was held to discuss a measure proposed by Representative Louise M. Slaughter, Democrat of New York, who is chairwoman of the House Rules Committee. It would ban seven classes of antibiotics important to human health from being used in animals, and it would restrict the uses of other antibiotics to therapeutic and some preventive uses.
The legislation is supported by the American Medical Association, among other groups, but opposed by farm organizations like the National Pork Producers Council. The farm lobbys opposition makes its passage unlikely, but advocates are hoping to include the measure in the legislation to revamp the health care system.
The Union of Concerned Scientists has estimated that as much as 70 percent of antibiotics used in the United States are given to healthy chickens, pigs and cattle to encourage their growth or to prevent illnesses.
The use of antibiotics for purposes other than for the advancement of animal or human health should not be considered judicious use, Dr. Sharfstein said in his written testimony. Eliminating these uses will not compromise the safety of food.
Much of Dr. Sharfsteins testimony summarized information that has been widely accepted for years by medical groups, including the American Medical Association. But many farm organizations dispute such claims.
There are no good studies that show that some of these antibiotic-resistant diseases and it seems like were seeing more of them have any link to antibiotic use in food animal production, said Dave Warner, a spokesman for the pork producers group.
Robert Martin, a senior officer at the Pew Environment Group, which has paid for an advertising campaign to support the measure, said the prospects for the measures passage were improving.
Just the fact that Congresswoman Slaughter is having hearings is a huge step forward.